Beware of hyped up public issues

The moral of the classic story by Hans Christian Andersen, The Emperor’s New Clothes, reveals how dangerous it is to be vain. There was an emperor who always loved to dress up. He was fooled by two tailors that they would stitch a suit from a fabric which could be seen only by those who were fit for their position. Though the emperor could not see the clothes himself, he pretended so.

And so did his courtiers for fear of being seen as unfit. The tailors pretend to drape the emperor who goes out in a procession wearing his ‘new clothes’. No one in the crowd sees any clothes but keep quiet for fear of being punished. Finally, it takes a child in the crowd to say that the emperor is not wearing anything. The emperor’s pride is shattered.

Let us see how this famous story works in the stock markets. Biocon tapped the capital markets in March 2005 and it was a highly hyped issue. The promoter (Kiran Majumdar Shaw) was projected as the demonstration of emerging woman power and she helped matters by typically walking a few feet above the ground. The issue did extremely well and the share is the only one in the list which has given positive returns. In a little over eight years when the Sensex is trading at 2.67 times, Biocon has returned 34 per cent.

Jet Airways was The issue in February 2005. The promoter’s ownership was the subject of a debate and it had a huge number of investment bankers to sell the issue. The promoter wanted to sell the brand separately and that became a talking point, which ultimately bombed and was sold for peanuts. The issue traded at a premium for a few months and then began its descent, from which it has never recovered.

Suzlon Energy tapped the markets in the inauspicious period of ‘shraddh’ when Hindus pay respect to the departed. The share had a good run for a couple of years and then its acquisition of companies in Europe caused its downfall. The share is yet to recover from its fall. This issue was also very well marketed by a large number of bankers.

DLF, in June 2007, was the real estate story of the century. The issue was marketed as India’s largest real estate player and land bank owner. DLF was also the first company to have ever paid a fine of Rs 1 crore to the market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India, for violation of minority shareholders’ rights in its earlier avatar.

The issue did well for a couple of quarters. But, once people understood land bank and real estate companies it was all over.

Reliance Power could be the reason for the beginning of the 2008 crisis in the Indian market. A galaxy of merchant bankers sold a power-packed story and also assured investors that the issue price of Rs 450 would list at four digits. If only words meant what were spoken, the market would be a different place. The issue bombed on Day One and this issue caused the largest loss of confidence among retail investors.

SKS Microfinance was touted as the messiah of the downtrodden. SKS was the company which would transform the lives of millions of poor Indians who could not approach banks for assistance. The issue did well for a mere 45 days and then all hell broke loose with the Andhra Pradesh government stepping in and regulating the industry. A stock issued at just under four digits is now trading in low double digits.

A2Z Maintenance was the issue where India’s Warren Buffet was the investor. It was in all the future businesses like solid waste management and green power. The share was very slickly marketed and had the ignominy of never trading at or above its issue price even once. The share is currently trading at less than a fourth of its price.

All these examples leave a common story for the public at large. Whenever something gets hyped and one is asked to step into someone else’s clothes to look at the picture, beware.

business standard article published today 080612

Performance of Newly Listed Shares as on 1st June 2012

Name Date of listing Issue Price closing  price closing price % gain loss  change over
1st June 25th May over week  lssue price
TBZ 9th May 120.00 107.15 116.05 -7.42 -10.71
Speciality Restaurants 30th May 150.00 167.3 N A 11.53 11.53

IPOs need to be priced right

The year 2012 has seen nine public issues so far. Of these, three, or one-third, have been withdrawn and one is yet to be listed. Of the remaining, four are trading at a discount and only one is above par. In 2011, 44 initial public offerings (IPOs) and three follow-on public offerings (FPOs) entered the market. And 11, or less than 24 per cent, are trading above issue price.

Price is the reason for investors to stay away from IPOs. There is a general sense of apathy among investors after having lost money in IPOs. This explains why the primary markets are in a bad shape. That the secondary markets are not doing well, either, is not helping investors. Markets, over the last 18 months, have not returned money to investors. Assets under management of equity funds have faced redemption pressure during this period.

The only way to rejuvenate the primary market is to get the IPO price right. So, what is the ‘right price’? This is a difficult question and calls for some effort and sacrifice from the promoters and merchant bankers. The sacrifice would be in terms of the company’s valuations, since if the amount raised is low, merchant bankers would earn that much lesser.

Every company tapping the capital markets has a peer group. The company and its business model would be comparable with this group. A fair price would be based on the company’s earnings per share (EPS) compared to that of the peer group, with a discount (as an unlisted company comes with risks). The complaint of overpricing of IPOs against merchant bankers and promoters stems from the fact that the fees paid are linked to the company’s valuation. Higher valuations fetch higher fees for bankers. So, merchant bankers push through a higher price for the IPO, with the help of media hype. Naturally, post-listing, the issue bombs.

Sebi does not allow future projections to be disclosed. Looking at the past numbers and peer group, one gets enough indications of a company’s potential. To extrapolate the financials after a year of listing is easy. But one appreciates there are reasons like market conditions, which make predicting the forward price difficult.

It is easier to predict the performance of the company and its earnings. Analysts have been doing this regularly, with fairly decent accuracy. If the performance and earnings of a company are predictable and one has a decent peer group comparison, why can’t the right price be arrived at by calculating backwards?

Before Sebi, the Controller of Capital Issues (CCI) was the regulator. Merchant bankers had to explain to CCI why their issue commanded a higher valuation. There was a procedure and formula laid down for calculation of premium. One does not want to revisit the days of CCI. But further deterioration of the primary market is imminent, if the present overpricing regime continues. In all, 181 listed entities would be floating issues worth Rs 27,000 crore by June 2013. Only then can the promoter shareholding be brought below the threshold limit of 75 per cent. If PSUs are also considered, the number grows by another Rs 12,000-13,000 crore. The combined figure of Rs 40,000 crore excludes fresh offerings from both private and government companies. With such a big pipeline, investors need to be choosy and pick only those with the right price.

The future will demand fair pricing from promoters and merchant bankers. These two also have to ensure they are available for discussion on the company’s performance after listing. At the end of the day one should only invest in performing companies.

business standard article published today 010612

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!