Sanghvi Forging & Engineering share closes with gains of 31% on day one

Shares of Sanghvi Forging & Engineering Limited listed for trading on the BSE and NSE yesterday the 23rd of May 2011. The opening price at the BSE was Rs 85 while it was Rs 88 on the NSE. The high was a staggering Rs 116.50 on the BSE and Rs 116.80 on the NSE. The low was the open of Rs 85 on the BSE while it was Rs 86.50 on the NSE.

The company had raised Rs 36.90 crs in a price band of Rs 80-85. The issue did not receive a single application in the QIB category and till the last couple of hours on closing day of the issue subscription was in a bad shape. The issue was subscribed by “friendly” sources with the HNI category subscribed 1.82 times and the retail category 2.93 times making the total issue subscribed 1.30 times. Readers would recall with the issue overall subscribed 1.30 times even though the retail portion was subscribed 2.93 times the allotment was done considering the spill over of the entire QIB category. A problem of this type had happened in the issue of Vaswani Industries which is yet to list.

Exchange Open High Low Close Net Change % Gain/loss Wt. Avg Volume Delivery Del %age
BSE 85.00 116.50 85.00 111.75 26.75 31.47 99.01 35256759 1958347 5.55
NSE 88.00 116.80 86.50 112.00 27.00 31.76 99.17 42733504 1774765 4.15
Total 77990263 3733112 4.79

The company had issued 43.41 lac shares and the total traded volume was 779.90 lac shares or 17.96 times the issue size. The weighted average of the day’s trade was Rs 99.01 on the BSE and Rs 99.17 on the NSE. Clearly the game of subscription in small cap issues with “friendly” brokers, intermediaries and then trapping of real investors post listing has been perfected into a fine game and is an art. I believe this need to be looked into by regulators and the people behind such voluminous trades on day one. IT is also important to have circuit filters on day one and not allow undue price movement on day one.

Looking at the above chart from the day’s trade on the BSE, one can see that the share remained steady right till 1 pm when it was trading around Rs 90. From there it started its upward move and rose virtually throughout the remainder part of the day to touch its intraday high of Rs 116.50 at around 3 pm accompanied by huge volumes. The share has given returns of over 30% at closing price to investors who have put money into an issue which has been subscribed only by HNI’s and retail investors. IT raises yet another question whether an issue which has received zero or inadequate response in the QIB category should be allowed to price the issue at the top end of the band or not?

All in all the issue has scored 30% plus gains on day one and entered the history books as successful issue on day one. It would however be interesting to see how many days the share trades in positive territory.

Performance of Newly Listed Shares as on 20th May 2011





Untitled Document

Name Date of Listing Issue Price closing  price closing price % gain loss  change over
20th May 13th May over week  lssue price
Muthoot Finance 6th May 175.00 158.2 165.6 -4.47 -9.60
Paramount Printpackaging 9th May 35.00 28.2 37.15 -24.09 -19.43
Future Ventures India 10th May 10.00 8.35 8.9 -6.18 -16.50
Servalakshmi Paper 12th May 29.00 13.15 18.2 -27.75 -54.66
Innoventive Industries 13th May 117.00 86.25 93.6 -7.85 -26.28


Galaxy Surfactants QIB portion undersubscribed

Issue Stands Withdrawn

Galaxy Surfactants Limited which had tapped the capital markets with its IPO for 59.3 lakh shares in a price band of Rs 325-340 has failed to receive adequate response from QIB’s. The QIB portion which closed for subscription on Wednesday the 18th of May received response for 12,26,400 shares or 59% of the QIB portion. The company had allotted 8,89,500 shares to 3 Anchor Investors at the top end of the price band.

Subsequent to the QIB portion not being subscribed, the Book Running Lead Managers and the Company have decided to withdraw the issue. The total response for the issue with one day to go for non QIB bidders was not satisfactory with the HNI portion subscribed 4% and the Retail portion subscribed 11%. The issue on an overall basis was subscribed 30%.

The withdrawal of the issue brings up two questions. The first which is the more obvious one is WHY? Why did the issue do badly and who is responsible for the same? I believe the answer is also as simple in that the issue was way overpriced. There has rarely been an IPO where almost all analysts, financial journalists and other market intermediaries have liked the company and appreciated the business model. The issue was of valuation and pricing, and the asking price at Rs 325-340 was a clear 20-25% higher than expected. The greed of merchant bankers in earning higher fees or commissions and their implicit faith in their investors at lapping up every issue at any price brought by them is the undoing. The promoter’s greed at wanting higher prices is also there but they are assured the same by the merchant bankers.

The second question that comes up is what next? Will the company again make an attempt or look at private equity for its capital needs. These are questions which will get answered in course of time. For the moment, the issuer of capital M/s Galaxy Surfactants Limited has lost out big time. They have been in the IPO mode, have spent tremendous amount of resources in terms of money and time, and lost out at the fag end. One feels for them and the effect that this would have on their business going forward. One only hopes that a common complaint voiced by people that issues are overpriced, a feeling which has been even endorsed by the Regulator is looked at seriously by Merchant Bankers going forward.

Readers would recall that even this writer at appreciated the business and the company Galaxy Surfactants but was unhappy at the pricing and had written about the same in the issue analysis. The article can be accessed here.

All in all something which is most unfortunate has happened. There are two good things that have certainly happened and one hopes this becomes an example for future companies. One more IPO which would probably have got subscribed in the end with some back to back arrangements and crashed on day one of listing will now not happen. Secondly this may serve as an example of overpricing to future promoters and Merchant Bankers tapping the capital markets.

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!